Gauhati High Court
CRP/50/2026 of Smti Kiter Ango Vs Daksor Ango on 22 June 2026
GAHC040009302026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/50/2026 Smti Kiter Ango Son of Late Dagyom Ango, resident of Biru Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Daksor Ango Son of Late
GAHC040009302026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : CRP/50/2026
Smti Kiter Ango Son of Late Dagyom Ango, resident of Biru Village, PO and PS
Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Daksor Ango Son of Late Gumdak Ango, resident of Biru Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Reken Ingo, Tegelum Tolo,S Ahmed,Kipa Yabi,Jumken Ete,Aruna Rai Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.06.2026 Heard Mr. Reken Ingo, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. By way of filing the present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a direction to the village authority/Customary Court of Biru village, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, for pronouncement of keba decision held by the village authority/Customary Court on 26.10.2023, relating to a dispute between the petitioner and the sole respondent, in respect of possession of a plot of land i.e. Reyi WRC land located at Reyi under Biru village, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
3. The case of the petitioner is that although the village authority/ Customary Court of Biru village, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, heard both parties in respect of a dispute regarding possession of Reyi WRC land, on 26.10.2023, and verbally pronounced its keba decision, however, the said decision has not been reduced into writing due to alleged threats by the respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner is confined to the inordinate delay in pronouncement of the decision or furnishing the decision in respect of the keba proceeding conducted on 26.10.2023 before the village authority/Customary Court of Biru village, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, despite repeated representations submitted before the concerned authorities.
5. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of the Civil Revision Petition at the motion stage itself by directing the village authority/Customary Court of Biru village, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, to pronounce the keba decision in terms of the keba proceeding recorded on 26.10.2023.
6. Considering the limited nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and without entering into the merits of the dispute between the parties; the instant civil revision petition is disposed of with a direction to the village authority/Customary Court of Biru village, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law and to conclude the pending proceeding arising out of the Keba held on 26.10.2023 and pronounce/furnish the decision/order within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the claims and counter-claims of the parties.
8. With the above observations and directions, the civil revision petition stands disposed of at the motion stage itself.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant