Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/90/2026 of Shri Karikho Kri Vs Dr. Mohesh Chai and 3 Ors. on 21 June 2026
GAHC040008762024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/90/2026 Shri Karikho Kri Age: 51 Occupation : Address:aged about 51 years S/o Late Kotri Kri resident of Kri Niwas Telluliang village PO/PS Tezu district Lohit
GAHC040008762024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/90/2026
Shri Karikho Kri
Age: 51
Occupation :
Address:aged about 51 years
S/o Late Kotri Kri
resident of Kri Niwas
Telluliang village
PO/PS Tezu
district Lohit
AP
VERSUS
Dr. Mohesh Chai and 3 Ors.
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:aged about 51 years
S/o Late Tankakso Chai
resident of T. Chai residence
Chai Colony
Tezu
PO/PS Lohit District
AP
2:Shri Badang Tayang
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:aged about 43 years
S/o Shri Banumso Tayang
reside tof Telluliang Village
Tezu
PO/PS Tezu
Lohit district
AP
3:Ms. Jeremai Krong
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:aged about 38 years
D/o Late Turkho Krong
resident of Changliang village
Tezu
PO/PS Tezu
District Lohit
AP
4:The Returning Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:for election to State Legislative Assembly for 44-Tezu(ST) Assembly Constituency Arunachal Pradesh PO/PS Tezu Lohit district AP
------------
Advocate for : Tanur Gao
Advocate for : Dicky Panging
Sr. Adv appearing for Dr. Mohesh Chai and 3 Ors.: Advocate , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, respectively.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.06.2026 Heard Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Doji, learned counsel for opposite party No. 1; Mr. K. Mena, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2; and Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel for opposite party No. 4. This is an application praying for issuance of summons to the Plaintiff Witness Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14 to produce original documents and tender evidence on behalf of the election petitioner. Perused the application. The witnesses sought to be summoned appear to be necessary for the proper adjudication of the election petition, as they are official witnesses and the relevant documents are stated to be in their custody. Thus, I deem it appropriate to allow this application by issuing summons to the aforesaid plaintiff witnesses. Accordingly, let summons be issued to the following Plaintiff Witnesses:-
1. Witness No. 3- Inspector Dumgandu Singpho, Officer-In-Charge, Police Station Tezu, Arunachal Pradesh.
2. Witness No. 5- Sr. Sub Registrar, Kamrup(M), Assam.
3. Witness No. 6- The Returning Officer, 44- Tezu(ST) Assembly Constituency, Tezu, Arunachal Pradesh.
4. Witness No. 7- Shri A. Mossang, Joint Secretary/PIO, Legislative Assembly, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.
5. Witness No. 8- The District Transport Officer (DTO), Tezu, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh.
6. Witness No. 9- The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank, Tezu Branch, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh.
7. Witness No. 10- The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Tezu Branch, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh.
8. Witness No. 11- The Branch Manager, LIC, Branch Office Doomdooma, Tinsukia District, Assam.
9. Witness No. 12- The District Transport Officer (DTO), Itanagar Capital Region, Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh.
10. Witness No. 13- The Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 1 (1), Dibrugarh, Assam.
11. Witness No. 14- The Deputy Commissioner, Office of Commissioner, CGST & CX, Itanagar, Sector ‘A’, Naharlagun- 791110. Interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant