Gauhati High Court

IA(Crl)/35/2019 of SHRI GIOGI PADANG Vs THE STATE OF A.P. AND ANR. on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040011242019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/35/2019 SHRI GIOGI PADENG S/O GIOGI TARAM, R/O VILLAGE, HATAM PO/PS SANGRAM DISTRICT KURUNG KUMEY, AP. MOBILE NO. 9862578724 VERSUS THE STATE OF A.P. AND

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040011242019

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(Crl)/35/2019

SHRI GIOGI PADENG S/O GIOGI TARAM, R/O VILLAGE, HATAM PO/PS

SANGRAM DISTRICT KURUNG KUMEY, AP. MOBILE NO. 9862578724

VERSUS

THE STATE OF A.P. AND ANR.

REPRESENTED THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

2:SHRI AKIYOM SOJA

Age: 0 Occupation :

S/O SHRI DAI SOJA

R/O VILLAGE SANCHU

PO/PS CHAYANG TAJO

DISTRICT EAST KAMENG AP

Advocate for the Petitioner : T Tayu, L Bui,L Nyodu,N Rebe,M Tajum,T Nyodu,MrT Taba,D

Yami,T Camdir,B Taba,L Koyu

Advocate for the Respondent : , P P of AP,,,,,,,,, Linked Case : Crl.A./19/2019

SHRI GIOGI PADANG

Age: 0 Occupation :

Address:S/O GIOGI TARAM

R/O VILLAGE HATAM

PO/PS SANGRAM DISTRICT KURUNG KUMEY

AP. MOBILE NO. 9862578724

VERSUS

THE STATE OF A.P. AND ANR.

Age: 0

Page No.# 2/2

Occupation :

Address:REPRESENTED THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOE

2:SHRI AKIYOM SOJA

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:S/O SHRI DAI SOJA

R/O VILLAGE SANCHU

PO/PS CHAYANT TAJO

DIST. EAST KAMENG

AP.

------------

Advocate for : MrT Taba

Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for THE STATE OF A.P. AND ANR.: Advocate , appearing for 2, respectively.

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 18.06.2026

Heard Ms. Nimcha Hondique, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant.

2. In view of the order passed by this Court in the connected criminal appeal being Crl.A. 19(AP)2019, no further order is called for in this interlocutory application and the interlocutory application, accordingly, stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead