Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/159/2026 of Bomdak Gara and Anr Vs The Registrar General and Anr on 17 June 2026
GAHC040005062026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/159/2026 Bomdak Gara and Anr Son of Shri Ebom Gara, resident of Village Dipa, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Bomyir Ragi
GAHC040005062026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/159/2026
Bomdak Gara and Anr
Son of Shri Ebom Gara, resident of Village Dipa, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Bomyir Ragi Age:
Occupation :
Wife of Bomdak Gara
resident of Village Dipa
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The Registrar General and Anr
Gauhati High Court, Guwahati, Assam.
2:The Registrar
Age: 0
Occupation :
Gauhati High Court
Itanagar Permanent Bench
Naharlagun
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. U Bori Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. HK Das, Senior Counsel & Standing Counsel, Gauhati High Court Ms. Nikita Danggen for
respondent No.2
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.06.2026
Heard Mr. U Bori, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Also heard Mr. HK Das, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. NK Sarma, the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Ms.Nikita Danggen, the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the respondent No.2.
2. The petitioners in the instant proceedings are husband and wife. The petitioner No.1 is the husband working as a Driver in the Office of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Civil Judge (Senior Divison) Yupia, in the District of Papum Pare, whereas the petitioner No.2 is working as a Process Server in the establishment of the Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Civil Judge (Senior Division) Changlang.
3. The grievance of the petitioners in the instant writ petition is that the husband and the wife are staying apart and, therefore, both have submitted representations which were not considered.
4. Mr. HK Das, the learned Senior Counsel as well as the Standing Counsel, Gauhati High Court has placed before this Court an instruction issued by the Registrar of the Itanagar Bench of the Gauhati High Court which is kept on record and marked with the letter ‘X’.
5. From the said instructions, it is apparent that the representation submitted by the petitioner No.1 had been accepted and the petitioner No.1 would be transferred to the Changlang district, wherein the petitioner No.2 is discharging her services as a Process Server in the establishment of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate- cum-Civil Judge (Senior Division).
6. Taking into account the above as the grievance of the petitioners have been duly taken care of by the respondent authorities, nothing further survives in the instant writ petition, for which, the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant