Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/44/2026 of Taguk Maruk Vs The State of AP and Anr on 15 June 2026
GAHC040008782026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/44/2026 Taguk Maruk Son of Late Tamar Maruk, resident of Veterinary Colony, Daporijo, PO and PS Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008782026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/44/2026
Taguk Maruk
Son of Late Tamar Maruk, resident of Veterinary Colony, Daporijo, PO and PS
Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and Anr
represented by the PP of AP 2:Biri Taling Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Shri Biri Tabiak
resident of Chimpu (near Little Flower School)
PO Itanagar
PS Chimpu
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Moses Tangzang, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.06.2026 Heard Mr. M. Tangzang, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. This interlocutory application has been filed seeking impleadment of the informant, namely Shri Biri Taling, as respondent No. 2 in Crl. Petn. No. 142(AP)/2026.
3. It is submitted that, due to inadvertence, the said informant was not arrayed as a party respondent in the aforesaid criminal petition. Accordingly, the applicant seeks permission to implead him as respondent No. 2.
4. The prayer so made has not been opposed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
5. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed.
6. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title by impleading Shri Biri Taling as respondent No. 2 in Crl. Petn. No. 142(AP)/2026.
7. With the above directions, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant