Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/45/2026 of Techi Topu Tara and Anr Vs The State of AP on 15 June 2026
GAHC040008872026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/45/2026 Techi Topu Tara and Anr Son of Late Techi Teyi, resident of Village Khemlee. PO and PS Sagalee, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Nabam
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008872026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/45/2026
Techi Topu Tara and Anr
Son of Late Techi Teyi, resident of Village Khemlee. PO and PS Sagalee, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Nabam Shanti Techi Age:
Occupation :
Wife of Techi Topu Tara
resident of Village Khemlee
PO and SP Sagalee
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP
represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Techi Ita Tara, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.06.2026 Heard Mr. T. Ita Tara, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. This application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking correction of the particulars appearing on page No. 2 of the main petition, being Crl. Petn. No. 146(AP)/2026.
3. Mr. Tara, learned counsel for the applicants, submits that due to an inadvertent typographical error, the cause title on page No. 2 of Crl. Petn. No. 146(AP)/2026 reflects the relief as "For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or Certiorari" instead of "Issue notice and call for the criminal case records." He, therefore, prays for correction of the said error.
4. The prayer, not being objected to by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, is allowed.
5. In view of the above, the applicants are permitted to do the necessary correction and are granted 2 (two) days' time to amend the cause title.
6. In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant