Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/33/2026 of Kunu Saikia Vs The State of AP on 14 June 2026
GAHC040006152026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/33/2026 Kunu Saikia Age: 32 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Khirud Saikia resident off House No.3 Baginadi Lal Pani Kadam Moidumia PS Baginadi Lakhimpur
GAHC040006152026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/33/2026
Kunu Saikia
Age: 32
Occupation :
Address:Son of Shri Khirud Saikia
resident off House No.3
Baginadi Lal Pani
Kadam
Moidumia
PS Baginadi
Lakhimpur
Lakhimpur District
Assam 787032
VERSUS
The State of AP
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:represented by the PP of AP
2:The Superintendent of Police
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Upper Subansiri District
Daporijo
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Officer in Charge
Age: 0
Occupation :
Address:Daporijo Police Station
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : D Dutta
Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP: Advocate , appearing for 2, 3, respectively.
Linked Case : AB/42/2026
Kunu Saikia
Son of Shri Khirud Saikia,
resident off House No.3,
Baginadi Lal Pani,
Kadam,
Moidumia,
PS Baginadi,
Lakhimpur,
Lakhimpur District,
Assam
787032
VERSUS
The State of AP
represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Biplop Konwar, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 15-06-2026
Heard Ms. D. Dutta, learned counsel for the accused applicant and Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In view of the order passed today in AB No. 42/2026, the applicant seeks leave to withdraw this interlocutory application with a liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate forum, if so advised. The prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant