Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/231/2026 of M/s H D Enterprise and Anr Vs The Union of India and 3 Ors on 28 May 2026
GAHC040007492026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/231/2026 M/s H D Enterprise and Anr a proprietorship firm having its office at Qtrs No.BB 44, D Sector, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791111
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040007492026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/231/2026
M/s H D Enterprise and Anr
a proprietorship firm having its office at Qtrs No.BB 44, D Sector, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791111
2: Hamam Daba
Age:
Occupation :
proprietor of M/s H D Enterprise
Qtrs No.BB-44
D Sector
Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh. 79111
VERSUS
The Union of India and 3 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Govt of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi 110001
2:The Commissioner (Appeals)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Central Goods and Service Tax
GST Bhawan
Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh. 791111
3:The Assistant Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Central Goods and Service Tax
Papum Pare District
Page No.# 2/2
Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 791111
4:The Superintendent
Age: 0
Occupation :
Central Goods and Service Tax
Papum Pare District
Itanagar Zone-II
Arunachal Pradesh 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : Gautam Phukan, Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, SC Central Excise and Customs,Tania Kipa,DSGI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 29-05-2026 Mr. G. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty, as prayed for. Ms. O. Jerang, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M. Kato, learned Dy.S.G.I. and Mr. T. Kipa, learned Standing Counsel, CGST, appearing for the respondents are present. JUDGE Comparing Assistant