Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/577/2025 of M/s Kipa Para Vs The State of AP and 4 Ors on 25 May 2026
GAHC040020232025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/577/2025 M/s Kipa Para a registered Class III Contractor under APPWD, represented through its sole proprietor Smti Kipa Para, having its office at Papum
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040020232025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/577/2025
M/s Kipa Para
a registered Class III Contractor under APPWD, represented through its sole proprietor Smti Kipa Para, having its office at Papum Village, PO and PS Balijan, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 4 Ors
through the Commissioner/ Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0
Occupation :
Water Resources Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Water Resources Circle
Itanagar.
4:The Executive Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Water Resources Division
Yupia
Papum Pare District
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
5:M/s T K Enterprises
Age: 0
Occupation :
Shop No. 02
Page No.# 2/2
Kuchubari
Balijan
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Lissing Perme, Signal Yirang,Ngakar Karlo,T Tatin Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 26.05.2026 Mr. S. Yirang, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the writ petition, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the same. Ms. K. Wangmo, learned State Counsel for the respondents, is present. Prayer for withdrawal is allowed. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant