Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/22/2025 of Taw Dulom Vs The State of AP and 7 Ors on 25 May 2026
GAHC040000682025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/22/2025 Taw Dulom Son of Taring Dulom, permanent resident of Daporijo, PO and PS Daporijo, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Ors through the
GAHC040000682025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/22/2025
Taw Dulom
Son of Taring Dulom, permanent resident of Daporijo, PO and PS Daporijo, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 7 Ors
through the Commissioner, Education, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Commissioner Education
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Secretary Education
Age: 0
Occupation :
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
4:The State Project Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Samagra Shiksha / ISSE
Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar 791111
5:The Deputy State Project Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Samagra Shiksha/ ISSE
Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
791111
6:The District Project Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Samagra Shiksha/ ISSE
Upper Subansiri District
Daporijo.
7:Tamchi Taniang
Age: 0
Occupation :
DPC
O/o the DDSE
Raga
Kamle District
791120
8:Nyato Dukum
Age: 0
Occupation :
Honorable Minister (Commerce and Industries Labour IPR etc) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Gimi Tarak, Byabang Mema,Taja Garam Advocate for the Respondent : Taba Tagum, Tadu Tamin,Tsering Nyima,Nabam Kakum,Abhai Kumar Singh,T Kumar,Pramod Kr. Gour,SC (Education)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 26.05.2026 Mr. K. Mena, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Garam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. T. Nyima, learned counsel for the respondent No.7, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on having been become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant