Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/270/2025 of Runa Kasang Sangcho and Anr Vs The State of AP and 6 Ors on 24 May 2026
GAHC040009572025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/270/2025 Runa Kasang Sangcho and Anr Son of Shri Salung Kasang Sangcho, Sachung Village, PO Lada, PS Nafra, Bichom District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Singchang
GAHC040009572025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/270/2025
Runa Kasang Sangcho and Anr
Son of Shri Salung Kasang Sangcho, Sachung Village, PO Lada, PS Nafra, Bichom District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Singchang Miji
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Degan Miji
Village Nabolong
PO Lada
PS Nafra
Bichom District
Arunachala Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Commissioner / Secretary
Age: 0
Occupation :
Land Management
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Land Management
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
4:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Bichom District
Arunachal Pradesh
Napanghpung.
5:The Extra Assistant Commissioner cum DLRSO
Age: 0
Occupation :
Bana
Bichom District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:The District Land and Revenue Settlement Officer Age: 0
Occupation :
West Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh
Bomdila.
7:The District Land and Revenue Settlement Officer Age: 0
Occupation :
East Kameng District
Seppa
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara, Pondit Ronya,Kirmani Lollen,Y Mugli,Taba Tokur,Terji Kamchi,Khoda Apa,Gamken Bam Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25-05-2026 Mr. P. Ronya, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the writ petition and therefore, prays for withdrawal of the same.
Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant