Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/567/2023 of Joram Tapu Vs The Chairman cum Managing Director on 24 May 2026
GAHC040016222023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/567/2023 Joram Tapu S/o Lt. Joram Guth, village-peil Joram, PO Joram, PS Yachuli, Lower Subansiri District, Ziro. Arunachal Pradesh. Mob No. 8415079940 VERSUS
GAHC040016222023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/567/2023
Joram Tapu
S/o Lt. Joram Guth,
village-peil Joram,
PO Joram,
PS Yachuli,
Lower Subansiri District,
Ziro.
Arunachal Pradesh.
Mob No. 8415079940
VERSUS
The Chairman cum Managing Director
Power Grid, B-9, Qutab Institution Area, Kalwaria, Saria, Govt. of India Undertaking, New Delhi, 110016
2:The Chief General Manager
Age: 0
Occupation :
(NERTS)
Power Grid
Regional Office
Dongtieh
Lower Nongrah
Lapalang Football Ground Road
Shillong
Meghalaya793006
3:The Executive Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Power Grid
Branch Office
Arunachal Pradesh
Mowb-II
Niti vihar
Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
PO/PS Itanagar
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Secretary (Power)
Age: 0
Occupation :
Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat
Block No. 3
5th Floor
Room No. 1
Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
5:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Lower Subansiri District
Ziro
PO/PS Ziro
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : C Logi, L Tatam,N Taji Advocate for the Respondent : Lissing Perme, A Syiem,S Deb,N Khera,SC(Power),GA (AP)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25-05-2026 None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. T. Marngar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3; Mr. L.
Perme, learned Standing Counsel, Power Department, for respondent No. 4 and Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, are present. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant