Gauhati High Court

IA(C)/109/2026 of M/s Loffa Construction Agency Vs M/s Khenewa Group and 4 Ors on 24 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040007382026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/109/2026 M/s Loffa Construction Agency having its office at Loffa Village, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh represented by its

GAHC040007382026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(C)/109/2026

M/s Loffa Construction Agency

having its office at Loffa Village, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh represented by its proprietor Shri Rali Yangda, Son of Late Takar Yangda, Loffa Village, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

M/s Khenewa Group and 4 Ors

having its office at A Sector, Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, PO and PS

Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh, represented by its proprietor Shri Rumak Jomoh, Son of Shri Sam Jamoh, Village Jomo, PO Khenewa, PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh.

2:The State of Arunachal Pradesh

Age: 0

Occupation :

represented by the Secretary

Public Works Department

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar

PO an PS Itanagar.

3:The Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

Public Works Department

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

4:The Chief Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Public Works Department

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Itanagar.

5:The Executive Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Public Works Department

Division Bameng

East Kameng District

Arunachal Pradesh

Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Tagum, Tassar Tato,Likha Tabin,Rage Koyu Advocate for the Respondent : Hage Lampu, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 25.05.2026 Heard Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. H. Lampu, learned counsel for the opposite party/respondent No.1 and Ms. T. Wangmo, learned State Counsel for the State respondents No.2 to 5. This is an application praying for impleadment of the applicant as a party respondent No.5 in the connected writ petition, being WP(C) No.130(AP)/2026. The writ petitioner/opposite party No.1 in the connected writ petition, being WP(C) No.130(AP)/2026, has challenged the tender process initiated by the Executive Engineer, PWD Division, Bameng, East Kameng District, pursuant to the Invitation for Bid (IFB) dated 20.03.2026, in connection with the project namely, “Integrated Development of Various Administrative Infrastructure at Newly Created Sijingwa CO Headquarters, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh (C/o CO Office Building, BDO Office, CO Residential Building, Type-II Quarters, Type-III Quarters, Type-IV Quarters, Bachelor Barracks and Community Playfield)”, having an estimated cost of Rs. 2970.00 lakhs.

It is submitted by Mr. Tagum, learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has also participated in the aforesaid tender process and, therefore, is a necessary party in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, he prays for impleadment of the applicant in the aforesaid writ petition. Having considered that the tender process was initiated by the respondent authorities pursuant to the Invitation for Bid dated 20.03.2026, and the applicant is stated to have participated in the said tender process, I am of the considered view that the applicant would be a necessary party in the connected writ petition, being WP(C) No.130(AP)/2026. Thus, the applicant is required to be impleaded in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the applicant is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No.5 in the connected writ petition. The I.A. stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead