Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/394/2024 of M/s H B Enterprises Vs The State of AP and 4 Ors on 21 May 2026
GAHC040011762024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/394/2024 M/s H B Enterprises Office at RWD Colony, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 and duly represented by Shri Raju Kyamdo,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040011762024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/394/2024
M/s H B Enterprises
Office at RWD Colony, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 and duly represented by Shri Raju Kyamdo, Son of Shri Tasing Kyamdo, Kyamdo Village, PO and PS Nacho, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh 791122
VERSUS
The State of AP and 4 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Department of Rural Works Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
2:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD
Arunachal Pradesh
Rural Works Circle
Yachuli
3:The Chief Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh
4:The Executive Engineer / DPIU-I
Age: 0
Occupation :
RWD
Daporijo Division
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/2
5:M/s Nima Enterprises
Age: 0
Occupation :
Mengina village
PO and PS Daporijo
Upper Subansiri District
Arunachal Pradesh 79112
Advocate for the Petitioner : Lentsothe Sangtam, M Hussain,A Sarma Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, Duge Soki,SC(RWD)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22.05.2026 Mr. L. Sangtam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the same. The prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant