Gauhati High Court

IA(C)/106/2026 of Taten Tapak Vs The State of AP and 15 Ors on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040006852026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/106/2026 Taten Tapak Son of Shri Tayem Tapak, resident of Riga (Mongku)/ Mobuk Village, PO Riga, SP Boleng, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State

GAHC040006852026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(C)/106/2026

Taten Tapak

Son of Shri Tayem Tapak, resident of Riga (Mongku)/ Mobuk Village, PO Riga, SP

Boleng, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

The State of AP and 15 Ors

represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, 5th Floor, Block-II, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.

Age: 0

Occupation :

Department of Land Management

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

3:The Deputy Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

4:The Extra Assistant Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

Page No.# 2/8

5:The District Agriculture Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

6:The District Horticulture Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

7:The District Fisheries Development Officer Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

8:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

9:The Range Forest Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

10:The Assistant Sericulture Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

11:The Assistant Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

PWD

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

12:The Assistant Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Water Resources Sub Division

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

13:The Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

ACB

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

14:The Superintendent of Police

Age: 0

Occupation :

ACB

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

15:The DSP cum Officer in Charge

Age: 0

Occupation :

ACB

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

16:The Union of India

Age: 0

Occupation :

represented by the Border Road Organization Advocate for the Petitioner : Gallen Taloh, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (ACB),Ojing Pada,DSGI,Marto Kato Linked Case : PIL/7/2026

Taten Tapak

Age: 34

Occupation :

Address:Son of Shri Tayem Tapak

resident of Riga (Mongku/ Mobuk Village)

PO Riga

PS Boleng

Siang District

Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

The State of AP and 15 Ors

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:represented by the Chief Secretary Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 5th Floor Block-II

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

2:The Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Department of Land Management

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

3:The Deputy Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

4:The Extra Assistant Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

5:The District Agriculture Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

6:The District Horticulture Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

7:The District Fisheries Development Officer Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

8:The District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

9:The Range Forest Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

10:The Assistant Sericulture Officer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

11:The Assistant Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:PWD

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

12:The Assistant Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:Water Resources Sub Division

Boleng

Siang District

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

13:The Commissioner

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:ACB

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

14:The Superintendent of Police

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:ACB

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh

Civil Secretariat

Itanagar

Arunachal Pradesh.

15:The DSP cum Officer in Charge

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:ACB

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

16:The Union of India

Age: 0

Occupation :

Address:represented by the Border Road Organization

------------

Advocate for : Gallen Taloh

Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 15 Ors: Advocate ,

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 21-05-2026 (K. Ete, J) Heard Mr. G. Taloh, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 13; Mr. O. Pada, learned Special Public Prosecutor, ACB, for the respondent Nos. 14 & 15 as well as Ms. Y. Gao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M. Kato, learned DySGI for the respondent No. 16.

2. This is an application praying for impleadment of The Union of India, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Border Roads Division), New Delhi, as party respondent No. 17 in the connected PIL No. 07/2026 (Shri Taten Tapak -vs- The State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors.).

3. The applicant, by way of the Public Interest Litigation, has approached this Court against payment of land compensation in respect of the “Construction/Improvement of Ditte Dimme–Migging Road from existing CL-09 Road to NHDL Specification from Design Chainage Km 0.000 to Km 51.015 (Existing Chainage Km 0.00 to Km 53.000)” under 761 BRTF Project Brahmank in Arunachal Pradesh (PKG-I & PKG-II of Part II), a project being executed by the Border Roads Organisation under the Union of India, Ministry of Defence (Border Roads Division), inter alia alleging inflated and arbitrary assessment and payment of compensation to purported landowners, inclusion of persons having no land or lawful entitlement thereto, disproportionate valuation of properties/assets and disbursement of compensation against non-existent or falsely projected structures.

4. Having considered that the issue raised in the connected PIL is against not only the State of Arunachal Pradesh and its authorities but also the Union of India, particularly the Ministry of Defence (Border Roads Division) and considering that this Court, vide order dated 12.05.2026, has permitted the petitioners to file an appropriate application for impleadment of the Union of India, we deem it appropriate to allow the present interlocutory application, as the Union of India, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Border Roads Division), New Delhi, would be a necessary party for proper adjudication of the connected PIL.

5. Accordingly, the applicant is allowed to implead “the Union of India, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Border Roads Division), New Delhi”, as party respondent No. 17 in the connected PIL No. 07/2026.

6. The interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead