Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/249/2025 of Yamgeng Mize and Anr Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 20 May 2026
GAHC040008942025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/249/2025 Yamgeng Mize and Anr Power of Attorney holder of Frim ER Gemin Yomso, resident of Mirku Village, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal
GAHC040008942025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/249/2025
Yamgeng Mize and Anr
Power of Attorney holder of Frim ER Gemin Yomso, resident of Mirku Village, PO
and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Er Gemin Yomso
Age:
Occupation :
proprietor of frim ER Gemin Yomso
resident of Mirku Village
PO and PS Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Department of Urban Local Body, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District.
2:The Chief
Councillor
Age: 0
Occupation :
Pasighat Municipal Council
Gumin Nagar
Pasighat
PO and PS Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Executive Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Pasighat Municipal Council
Gumin Nagar
Pasighat
PO and PS Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Bharat Lego
Age: 0
Occupation :
proprietor of M/s BL Enterprise
2 Mile Pasighat
PO and PS Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:Kangge Dai
Age: 0
Occupation :
proprietor of firm Er Kangge Dai
Village Balek
PO and PS Pasighat
East Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Kago Taja, K Tagyang Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21.05.2026 Mr. Z. Mannow, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Taja, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition. Ms. K. Wangmo, learned State Counsel, is present.
Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant