Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/250/2025 of Tonong Darang and Anr Vs The State of AP and 3 Ors on 20 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040008952025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/250/2025 Tonong Darang and Anr resident of Village Renging, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: M/s Pro Enterprise Age: Occupation :

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040008952025

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C)/250/2025

Tonong Darang and Anr

resident of Village Renging, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.

2: M/s Pro Enterprise

Age:

Occupation :

Renging Village

PO and PS Pasighat

East Siang District

Arunachal Pradesh

VERSUS

The State of AP and 3 Ors

represented by the Secretary, Department of Urban Local Body, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.

2:The Chief Councillor

Age: 0

Occupation :

Pasighat Municipal Council

Gumin Nagar

Pasighat

PO and PS Pasighat

East Siang District

Arunachal Pradesh

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

3:The Executive Engineer

Age: 0

Occupation :

Pasighat Municipal Council

Gumin Nagar

Pasighat

PO and PS Pasighat

Page No.# 2/2

East Siang District

Arunachal Pradesh

Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.

4:Bharat Lego

Age: 0

Occupation :

proprietor of M/s BL Enterprise

2 Mile Pasighat

PO and PS Pasighat

East Siang District

Arunachal Pradesh

Advocate for the Petitioner : Kago Taja, Nabam Talin,K Tagyang Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 21.05.2026 Mr. Z. Mannow, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Taja, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition. Ms. K. Wangmo, learned State Counsel, is present. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead