Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/226/2026 of Jomba Ado and Anr Vs Kage Ado and 2 Ors on 19 May 2026
GAHC040007222026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/226/2026 Jomba Ado and Anr Son of Late Kirjom Ado, permanent resident of Rigo Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh 791001 2: Jomdar
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040007222026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/226/2026
Jomba Ado and Anr
Son of Late Kirjom Ado, permanent resident of Rigo Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh 791001
2: Jomdar Ado
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Kirjom Ado
permanent resident of Rigo Village
PO and PS Aalo
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh 79100
VERSUS
Kage Ado and 2 Ors
Son of Late Roka Ado, Head Gaon Burah of Rigo Village, Permanent resident of Rigo Village, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh 791001 2:Smti Nyayum Ingo Ado Age: 54
Occupation :
Wife of Late Kirjom Ado
Permanent resident of Rigo Village
PO and PS Aalo
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh 791001
3:Smti Togam Bam Ado
Age: 50
Occupation :
Wife of Late Kirjom Ado
Permanent resident of Rigo Village
PO and PS Aalo
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh 79100
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato, Oli Jerang,Yasmin Gao,Tony Meto,Nyali Sora,Mepe Ete Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20.05.2026 Mr. M. Ete, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh, if so advised. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant