Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/278/2025 of Nabam Tadik Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 10 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC040009762025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/278/2025 Nabam Tadik Son of Shri Nabam Ratung, resident of Rupung Village, PO and PS Leporiang Circle, Sagalee, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040009762025

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

(ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C)/278/2025

Nabam Tadik Son of Shri Nabam Ratung, resident of Rupung Village, PO and PS

Leporiang Circle, Sagalee, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.

VERSUS

The State of AP and 5 Ors

represented by the Secretary, Land Management Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.

2:The Director Land Management Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.

3:The Deputy Commissioner Papum Pare District Yupia Arunachal Pradesh.

4:The Additional Deputy Commissioner Balijan PO and PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.

5:The Additional Deputy Commissioner In Charge Balijan PO and PS Balijan Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.

6:Miss Nabam Apung

Age: 0 Occupation :

Daughter of late Nabam Tata

C/o Chief Medical Superintendent TRIHMS Naharlagun PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Rajesh Sonar, Khyoda Yayo,M Basar,Michi Khambo,Binny Nyaruce,R Taku Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Rup Techi Tara,Anil Podo,Tassar Tato,Along Tabang,Hage Tai,Likha Tabin,Rage Koyu,Taba Tagum

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 11.05.2026 As prayed for by Mr. Nabam Saha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; the instant writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if so advised.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Ms. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, and Mr. Taba Tagum, learned counsel, are present on behalf of their respective respondents.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead