Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/97/2026 of Dr Mai Kuru Camder Vs The NERIST and 5 Ors on 6 May 2026
GAHC040006412026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/97/2026 Dr Mai Kuru Camder Son of Late Mai Tar, permanent resident of Village Mai, Keyi Panyor District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The NERIST and 5 Ors
GAHC040006412026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/97/2026
Dr Mai Kuru Camder
Son of Late Mai Tar, permanent resident of Village Mai, Keyi Panyor District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The NERIST and 5 Ors
represented by its Board of Management, Nrijuli, Arunachal Pradesh 791109
2:The Chairman
Age: 0
Occupation :
Board of Management
NERIST
Nirjuli
Arunachal Pradesh 791109
3:The Fact Finding Committee
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its members
namely Prof (Mrs) M.A.Choudhuri
NIT
Nagpur
Maharashtra and Dr S Goverdhan Rao
former Registrar
NIT
Warangal
Andhra Pradesh
notice to be served through the Director NERIST
Nirjuli
Arunachal Pradesh 791109
4:The Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
NERIST
Nirjuli
Arunachal Pradesh 791109
5:Prof Narendranath S
Age: 0
Occupation :
Director
NERIST
Nirjuli
Arunachal Pradesh 791109
6:Smti Toko Yajur
Age: 0
Occupation :
Wife of Shri Mai Kuru Camder
resident of Nirjuli Village-I
PO and PS Nirjuli
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Marge Doji, Advocate for the Respondent : Nani Anju, S/C NERIST
-BEFORE-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
07.05.2026 Heard Mr. B. Kausik, learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. N. Anju, learned Standing Counsel, NERIST for respondent Nos. 1 to 3; Mr. J. Jini, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 & 5 and Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. K. Tama, learned counsel for respondent No. 6.
By filing this Interlocutory Application, the applicant has prayed for impleadment of Smti. Toko Yajur as party respondent No. 6 in WP (C) 194 (AP) 2026.
The prayer having not objected to by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents is allowed.
Accordingly, Smti. Toko Yajur is impleaded as party respondent Nos. 6 in WP (C) 194 (AP) 2026.
With the above, this Interlocutory Application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant