Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/524/2025 of Niglar Veo Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 5 May 2026
GAHC040018412025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/524/2025 Niglar Veo son of Shri Kajop Veo, a permanent resident of Veo Village, PO and PS Chayang Tajo, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh and proprietor
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040018412025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/524/2025
Niglar Veo
son of Shri Kajop Veo, a permanent resident of Veo Village, PO and PS Chayang Tajo, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh and proprietor of M/s Ane Yapung Enterprises, having its registered office at Veo Village, PO and PS Chayang Tajo, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Ors
represented by the Secretary, Land Management, Rural Development Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Director (RE)
Age: 0 Occupation :
rural Development Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Joint Director (RE)
Age: 0 Occupation :
Rural Development Department
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
4:The Deputy Director (RD)
Age: 0 Occupation :
Rural Development Department
Seppa East Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:The Tender Scrutiny Board
Age: 0 Occupation :
Page No.# 2/2
through its Chairman cum ADC
Seppa (HQ) East Kameng District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:M/s M B Enterprises
Age: 0 Occupation :
represented by its proprietor Shri Moik Bagang Son of Late Nikam Bagang Wada Bagang Village PO and PS Chayang Tajo East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 79010
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara, Pondit Ronya,Kirmani Lollen,Y Mugli,Terji Kamchi,Taba Tokur,Khoda Apa,Gamken Bam Advocate for the Respondent : Binter Picha, Takar Bagang,Pankaj Borah BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 06.05.2026 Mr. Gamken Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue this matter any further and he, therefore, prays for allowing him to withdraw the writ petition.
Prayer is accepted.
In view of the above; the instant writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant