Gauhati High Court
Review Pet./5/2026 of Nabam Tagam Vs The Deputy Commissioner and 6 Ors on 29 April 2026
GAHC040006042026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Review Pet./5/2026 Nabam Tagam Son of Shri Nabam March, Model village, Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Deputy
GAHC040006042026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Review Pet./5/2026
Nabam Tagam
Son of Shri Nabam March, Model village, Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The Deputy Commissioner and 6 Ors
Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2:The Circle Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Gumto Circle
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh 791112
3:Teli Tadap
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Teli Niya
Bogoli Village
Gumto Circle
PO and PS Doimukh
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh 791112
4:Smti Tajin Yaming
GB Denka
Age: 0
Occupation :
Wife of Shri Tajin Kor
Village Denka
Gumto Circle
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh 791112
5:Taba Tagam
GB Denka
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Taba Kehi
Sareh Village
Gumto Circle
PO and PS Doimukh
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.791111
6:Taying Rania Tarh
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Taying Bado
Sareh Village
Gumto Circle
PO and PS Doimukh
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.791111
7:The President
Age: 0
Occupation :
All Arunachal Pradesh Gaon Burah and Gaon Buri Welfare Association and Presiding Customary Judge Upper Dobam Village Banderdewa Circle PO and PS Banderdewa Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Regum Nabam, Nikon Tana,Apra Linggi,Rima Taipodia Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30.04.2026 Mr. R. Nabam, learned counsel for the review petitioner, prays for withdrawal of the review petition. Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned State Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, is present. Accordingly, the review petition stands closed on withdrawal.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant