Gauhati High Court
PIL/1/2026 of Iken Tao and 4 Ors Vs The State of AP and 6 Ors on 27 April 2026
GAHC040001522026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/1/2026 Iken Tao and 4 Ors Son of Shri Kari Tao, resident of Liru Village, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Binpi Doke Age:
GAHC040001522026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : PIL/1/2026
Iken Tao and 4 Ors
Son of Shri Kari Tao, resident of Liru Village, PO and PS Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Binpi Doke Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri Pekbin Doke
resident of Village Lipu
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3: Lomi Karlo
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri Talom Karlo
resident of Village Garu
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4: Kenyom Zirdo
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Boken Zirdo
resident of Village Silli
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5: Igo Tao
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri Goi Tao
resident of Village Kane
PO and PS Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.
2:The State of Arunachal Pradesh
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by the Commissioner cum Secretary PWD
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Chief Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
PWD Central Zone
Itanagar
PO and PS Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
PWD Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:The Executive Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
PWD Gensi Division Likabali
Lower Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairman
Age: 0
Occupation :
District Monitoring Committee
Liakbali
Lower Siang District
PO and PS Likabali
Arunachal Pradesh.
7:M/s IT Enterprise
Age: 0
Occupation :
represented by its proprietor Shri Doi Tarak Son of Late Mardo Tarak Liru Village Likabali PO Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Khoda Tari, Marnya Ete,Toko Rini,Taku Pumbo,Dilip Saikia Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), :::BEFORE:::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
28.04.2026
(M. Choudhury, J)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
-ORDER-
Mr. T. Pumbo, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner is waiting for further information, for which he has applied under the Right to Information Act, and he has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this PIL, with the liberty to file afresh.
Mr. R. H. Nabam, learned Addl. Advocate General is in attendance.
In view of the submission made by Mr. T. Pumbo, learned counsel for the petitioners, this PIL stands dismissed on withdrawal, with a liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant