Gauhati High Court
PIL/3/2026 of Tamar Nilling and 2 Ors Vs The State of AP and 5 Ors on 20 April 2026
GAHC040002072026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : PIL/3/2026 Tamar Nilling and 2 Ors Son of Late Tagio Nilling, PO and PS Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Kapnying Natam Age: Occupation : Son
GAHC040002072026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : PIL/3/2026
Tamar Nilling and 2 Ors
Son of Late Tagio Nilling, PO and PS Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Kapnying Natam
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Shri Rikap Natam
PO and PS Daporijo
Upper Subansiri District.
3: Kebu Dai
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Take Dai
PO and PS Daporijo
Upper Subansiri District
VERSUS
The State of AP and 5 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 791111
2:The Chief Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Central Zone A
PWD
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Superintending Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Daporijo Circle
PWD
Arunachal Pradesh
Daporijo.
4:The Executive Engineer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Daporijo Division
PWD
Arunachal Pradesh
Daporijo.
5:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Upper Subansiri Circle
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:M/s N T Agency
Age: 0
Occupation :
proprietor Shri Nabam Tadap
Son of Nabam Lillung
permanent resident of Parang Village
PO and PS Sagalee and presently residing at Prem Nagar PO and PS Naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh.
7:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Upper Subansiri Circle
Advocate for the Petitioner : Taja Garam, GICHIK KAKU,Byabang Mema Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21.04.2026 [Manish Choudhury, J.]
Heard Ms. B. Mema, learned counsel for the petitioners; and Ms. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the State respondents. Ms. Mema, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during the subsequent period, the petitioners have received some more materials which would be of relevance. Ms. Mema has submitted, on instruction, that the petitioners want to withdraw the PIL, with the liberty to file it afresh with more particulars. Ms. Wangmo, learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant PIL is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant