Gauhati High Court
Crl.Petn./128/2024 of Nilotpal Das and 2 Ors Vs Khoda Gyati on 19 April 2026
GAHC040010862024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./128/2024 Nilotpal Das and 2 Ors Son of Gopal Chandra Das, C/o Director, Finsperity Limited, resident of House No. 68 L, Graham road Tollygung, Kolkata
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040010862024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn./128/2024
Nilotpal Das and 2 Ors
Son of Gopal Chandra Das, C/o Director, Finsperity Limited, resident of House No.
68 L, Graham road Tollygung, Kolkata 700040
2: Mrinmoy Das
Age:
Occupation :
Son of Subhash Chandra Das
C/o Director
Finsperity Limited
resident of House No. 68 L
Graham Road
Tollygung
Kolkata 700040
3: Smti Dalia Das
Age:
Occupation :
Wife of Nilotpal Das
C/o Director
Finsperity Limited
resident of House No. 68 L
Graham Road
Tollygung
Kolkata 700040
VERSUS
Khoda Gyati
Son of Late Khoda Mudo, proprietor of M/s Amar Construction, resident of House Ni. IMC 651, Vivek Vihar, DN College Road, Itanagar, District Papumpare, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Jyoti Zongluju, Vijay Jamoh Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : Habung Aape, T Lampung,Jambey Tsering,Lod Asha,Sumit Chhetri BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20-04-2026 It is stated at the bar that the matter has been settled between the parties, and consequent to which a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 has been withdrawn, which has been allowed by the competent jurisdictional court.
In view of the above, Ms J. Zongluju, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. H. Aape, learned counsel for the respondent have submitted that the matter may be closed on having been become infructuous.
Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and considering that the matter has been settled between the parties, the criminal petition stands closed on having been become infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant