Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/140/2026 of Techi Jhonny Vs The State of AP and 6 Ors on 29 March 2026
GAHC040004522026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/140/2026 Techi Jhonny Son of Late Techi Modo, resident of village Khodaso, PO and PS Pakke Kessang, Pakke Kessang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State
GAHC040004522026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/140/2026
Techi Jhonny
Son of Late Techi Modo, resident of village Khodaso, PO and PS Pakke Kessang, Pakke Kessang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Ors
represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
2:The Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Land Management
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Itanagar.
3:The Deputy Commissioner
Age: 0
Occupation :
Capital Region Itanagar
Papum Pare District.
4:The Managing Director
Age: 0
Occupation :
Arunachal Pradesh Police Housing and Welfare Corporation Limited (APH and WCL)
Police Headquarters
Vivek Vihar
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/3
5:The Executive Engineer (CD)
Age: 0
Occupation :
APH and WCL
PHQ
Itanagar
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:The Superintendent of Police
Age: 0
Occupation :
ICR
Naharlagun
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
7:Neelam Son
Age: 0
Occupation :
proprietor M/s Marcy Engineering
PO and PS Nirjuli
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Regum Nabam, Nabam Ochungchunkna,Ebom Basar,G.C Taba,Apra Linggi Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30-03-2026 Mr. R. Nabam, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh, if so advised. The prayer is allowed.
Page No.# 3/3 The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant