Gauhati High Court
W.P.(Crl.)/2/2026 of Tai Shiva and Anr Vs The State of AP and 7 Ors on 23 March 2026
GAHC040004112026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/2/2026 Tai Shiva and Anr Son of Late Tai Epak, resident of Lekha Tomru Segment/ Village Doimukh, PO and PS Doimukh, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh
GAHC040004112026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/2/2026
Tai Shiva and Anr
Son of Late Tai Epak, resident of Lekha Tomru Segment/ Village Doimukh, PO and PS Doimukh, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 2: Ngakar Jumken Age:
Occupation :
Son of Late Ngakar Bajom
resident of Nirjuli
PO and PS Nirjuli
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
The State of AP and 7 Ors
represented through the PP of AP
2:The Chief Secretary
Age: 0
Occupation :
Civil Secretariat
Itanagar
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
3:The Commissioner (Political) Cum Chairman Age: 0
Occupation :
Scrutiny Committee
Civil Secretariat
Itanagar
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
4:The Director General of Police
Age: 0
Occupation :
PHQ
Itanagar
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
5:The Officer in Charge
Age: 0
Occupation :
Itanagar Police Station
Itanagar Capital Complex
Itanagar
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
6:The Investigation Officer
Age: 0
Occupation :
Itanagar Police Statin
Itanagar Capital Complex
Papum Pare District
Arunachal Pradesh.
7:Sawant Riang
Age: 0
Occupation :
Executive Engineer
PHE and WS Department
Naharlagun Division
PO and PS Naharlagun
Papum Pare District
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
8:Arun Riang
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Tachi Riang
C/o Er Sawant Riang
Executive Engineer
PHE and WS Department
Naharlagun Division
PO and PS Naharlagun
Papum Pare District
Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Tabit Tapak, T Tabing,Aso Dalbong,Bebeng Siboh Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, GA (AP)
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.03.2026
Mr. T. Tapak, learned counsel for the petitioners, at this stage, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh or appropriate application, to which Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, and Ms. G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents, have no objection. The prayer is allowed. This petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant