Gauhati High Court
BA/18/2026 of Patey Obing Vs The State of AP on 19 March 2026
GAHC040002572026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : BA/18/2026 Patey Obing Son of Patey Tajuk, Narba Colony Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP through the PP of AP Advocate for the
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040002572026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : BA/18/2026
Patey Obing
Son of Patey Tajuk, Narba Colony Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP
through the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Tony Pertin, T Mize Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 20-03-2026 Mr. E. Payeng, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T. Pertin, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that, vide order dated 05.03.2026, the accused applicant has already been discharged by the learned Trial Court at the stage of consideration of charge. Therefore, the present bail application has become infructuous. In view of the above, Mr. Payeng, learned counsel prays that he be allowed to withdraw the present bail application on having become Page No.# 2/2 infructuous. Prayer is allowed. The bail application stands dismissed on being infructuous. Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State is present.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant