Gauhati High Court
Crl.Petn./84/2025 of Gichik Tadik Vs The State of AP and 9 Ors on 15 March 2026
GAHC040006592025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./84/2025 Gichik Tadik Son of Late Gichik Tadar, permanent resident of Gangtung Village, PO and PS Tali, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The
GAHC040006592025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn./84/2025
Gichik Tadik Son of Late Gichik Tadar, permanent resident of Gangtung Village, PO
and PS Tali, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and 9 Ors
represented by the PP of AP
2:Yura kaha
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Yura Punung
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Yura Tagung
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Yura Dochu
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
4:Yura Taram
Age: 0
Occupation :
son of Yura Talang
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
5:Yura Tamu
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Shri Yura Sopin
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
6:Yura Tagang
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Yura Tarh
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
7:Yura Raja
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Shri Yura Sopin
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
8:Yura Tagam
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Yura Maj
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
9:Yura Arki
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Yura Loma
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh.
10:Smti Tam Kamji
Age: 0
Occupation :
permanent resident of Lodekore Village
PO and PS Tali
Kra Daadi District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Tayum Son, Nabam Taro,Tar Torum Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16.03.2026
Mr. T. Tai, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. Tar Torum, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this criminal petition.
Prayer, not being objected to by Ms. L. Hage, learned Addl. P.P., Arunachal Pradesh, is allowed.
In view of the above, the instant criminal petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant