Gauhati High Court
MACApp./13/2022 of Rinchin Tsering Vs Kesang Tsering and Anr. on 24 February 2026
GAHC040011212022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : MACApp./13/2022 Rinchin Tsering S/o Late Tsepchu, Permanent Resident of Pangchen Lodge, Bomdila, PO and PS Bomdila, District West Kameng, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040011212022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : MACApp./13/2022
Rinchin Tsering
S/o Late Tsepchu,
Permanent Resident of Pangchen Lodge, Bomdila, PO and PS Bomdila, District West Kameng, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Kesang Tsering and Anr.
S/o Lt. Nawang Jamba,
Resident of Village Sherbang, PO and PS Lumla, District Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh. (Claimant)
2:The Divisional Manager
Age: 0
Occupation :
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Main Road Tezpur PO and PS Tezpur Assam. (Oppostite Party No. 1
Advocate for the Petitioner : T Tsering, Takar Bagang,J Lomi Advocate for the Respondent : G Taloh, T Tayeng
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 25.02.2026 None appears for the appellant on call. However, Mr. V. T. Gurung, learned counsel for the respondent/claimant, is present. The learned counsel for the respondent/claimant submits that the matter is pending since 2022. Although, the compensation order was passed way back on 04.06.2022 the respondent/claimant has not been paid any amount till date, thereby causing lots of hardship to the respondent/claimant. The record reveals that the appellant took adjournments on several occasions and remained absent on 30.07.2025, 26.09.2025, and 23.01.2026, and today also none represented the appellant. From the conduct of the appellant as stated above, it appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the matter any further. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant