Gauhati High Court
IA(Crl)/11/2026 of Md Harez Ali Vs The State of AP on 22 February 2026
GAHC040002512026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/11/2026 Md Harez Ali Son of Md Murdas Ali, resident of Village Aminpara, PO and PS Rowta, Udalguri District, Assam. VERSUS The State of AP represented by the
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040002512026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(Crl)/11/2026
Md Harez Ali
Son of Md Murdas Ali, resident of Village Aminpara, PO and PS Rowta, Udalguri District, Assam.
VERSUS
The State of AP
represented by the PP of AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mukbang Pertin, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.02.2026
Heard Mr. Mukbang Pertin, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of delay of 460 days in preferring the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and sentence order dated 07.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), for the Districts of West Kameng, East Kameng Page No.# 2/2 and Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh in NDPS Case No. 21/2023.
3. The grounds for the delay in preferring the appeal has been explained in paragraph Nos. 5, 6 and 7 of the condonation application.
4. On consideration of the explanation stated in the aforesaid paragraphs, this Court is satisfied that the accused was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time.
5. Mr. G. Tado, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submits that he has no objection if the delay is condoned.
6. In view of the above, the delay of 460 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned.
7. With the above observation, the I.A. stands allowed and is disposed of.
8. List the connected appeal for admission on 05.03.2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant