Gauhati High Court
RSA/7/2025 of Bajong Pertin Vs Gemin Pertin and 2 Ors on 16 February 2026
GAHC040012722025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : RSA/7/2025 Bajong Pertin Son of Shri Maktel Pertin, Village Poblung, PO Dambuk, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Gemin Pertin and 2 Ors Son of
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040012722025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : RSA/7/2025
Bajong Pertin
Son of Shri Maktel Pertin, Village Poblung, PO Dambuk, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Gemin Pertin and 2 Ors
Son of Shri Makpak Pertin, Village Bolung, PO Bolung, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:Kabang Gamno Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Gongaying Gamno
Village Kangkong
PO Kangkong
Lower Dibang Valley District
Arunachal Pradesh.
3:Mibom Pertin
Age: 0
Occupation :
Son of Late Gora Pertin
Village Bolung
PO Bolung
Lower Dibang Valley District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Debo K Deori, Epra Melo Advocate for the Respondent : Jumgam Jini, Gyamar Jeevan,Migo Laye,Risso Aking,Bamang Tatung,O Deori,Taying Nega,Tao Tarin,Binter Picha
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 17.02.2026
Mr. Gamken Bam, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. Jumgam Jini, learned counsel for the respondents, and Mr. Debo Kr. Deori, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that he has the instructions from both the learned counsels for the parties who are unable to appear before the Court today to the extent that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties and as such, the matter has become infructuous and therefore, he has further instruction to withdraw the instant appeal on behalf of both the parties.
In view of the above submission and since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and has become infructuous; the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal is allowed.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed on withdrawal.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant