Gauhati High Court
Crl.Petn./116/2025 of Kendo Kamki Vs The State of AP and Anr on 12 February 2026
GAHC040008742025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./116/2025 Kendo Kamki Son of Late Moken Kamki, permanent resident of Peri Village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008742025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Crl.Petn./116/2025
Kendo Kamki Son of Late Moken Kamki, permanent resident of Peri Village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
The State of AP and Anr represented by the PP of AP
2:Remo Kamki
Age: 0 Occupation :
Son of Late Kenre Kamki
permanent resident of Peri Village
Po and PS Kamba
West Siang District
Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Mindo Taso,Idak Bam,Limi Bam Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Priya Lomdak,A Bodo,Lipi Niri BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.02.2026
Heard Ms. M. Mele, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Also heard Ms. Topi Jini, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 1; and Mr. A. Bodo, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2.
Page No.# 2/2 Ms. Jini, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Arunachal Pradesh, submits that the case has already been submitted into the charge-sheet before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aalo, on 09.05.2025, even before filing of the instant petition.
In view of the above, Ms. Mele, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant criminal petition with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after making necessary corrections.
Prayer is accepted.
The criminal petition, accordingly, stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if so advised.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant