Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/251/2025 of Gilli Kambu Vs Rido Marjum on 11 February 2026
GAHC040016972025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/251/2025 Gilli Kambu Son of Rogi Kambu, permanent resident of Pakam Village, West Siang District and presently residing at Model village, PO and PS Naharlagun,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040016972025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C)/251/2025
Gilli Kambu Son of Rogi Kambu, permanent resident of Pakam Village, West Siang District and presently residing at Model village, PO and PS Naharlagun, Itanagar Capital Region, Arunachal Pradesh. Father and natural Guardian of Shri Liken Kambu.
VERSUS
Rido Marjum resident of Abotani Colony, PO and PS Itanagar, Itanagar Capital Region, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rage Koyu, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : CRP/90/2025
Gilli Kambu
Age: 45 Occupation :
Address:Son of Rogi Kambu
permanent resident of Pakam Village
West Siang District and presently residing at Model village PO and PS Naharlagun Itanagar Capital Region Arunachal Pradesh. Father and natural Guardian of Shri Liken Kambu.
VERSUS
Rido Marjum Laye
Age: 41Occupation :
Address:resident of Abotani Colony
PO and PS Itanagar Itanagar Capital Region Arunachal Pradesh.
------------
Advocate for : Rage Koyu
Advocate for : appearing for Rido Marjum Laye: Advocate appearing for respectively.
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 12.02.2026
In view of the order passed by the Court today in the connected Civil Revision Petition, no further order is called for in this interlocutory application and the interlocutory application, accordingly, stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant