Gauhati High Court
IA(C)/254/2025 of The Superintending Engineer (E) Vs Raghbindar Ray on 10 February 2026
GAHC040017122025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) IA(C)/254/2025 In WA/5/2023 The Superintending Engineer (E) System Operation and Power System Communication (SO and PSC), Department of Power, Itanagar. VERSUS Raghbindar Ray
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040017122025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
(ITANAGAR BENCH)
IA(C)/254/2025 In
WA/5/2023
The Superintending Engineer (E)
System Operation and Power System Communication (SO and PSC), Department of Power, Itanagar.
VERSUS
Raghbindar Ray
Son of Shri Shibalak Ray, R/o Quarter No. 4, Type I, R.K. Mission Complex, Itanagar 791113, Arunachal Pradesh.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Lissing Perme, SC(Power)
Advocate for the Respondent : , Appear in person BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
S.K. Medhi, J. 11.02.2026 Heard Shri L. Perme, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Shri Raghbindar Ray, opposite party/writ petitioner who has appeared in-person. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for review and recall of certain observations made by this Court in its order dated 03.09.2025 passed Page No.# 2/2 in WA/05/2023. We are, however, of the opinion that the prayer made is a prayer which would amount to review of the aforesaid order dated 03.09.2025. The Rules holding the field prescribe for filing a review petition and the same cannot be replaced by filing an interlocutory application. In view of the above, the I.A. is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to approach this Court in the form and in the appropriate manner.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant