Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3239/2026 of MD IFTIKAR SAIKIA Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010225272026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3239/2026 MD IFTIKAR SAIKIA SON OF LATE LALCHAND SAIKIA RESIDENT OF KORORA P.S BAIHATA CHARIALI DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010225272026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3239/2026

MD IFTIKAR SAIKIA

SON OF LATE LALCHAND SAIKIA RESIDENT OF KORORA P.S BAIHATA

CHARIALI DISTRICT KAMRUP, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Y S MANNAN, M BEGUM,MR. AJAY SARMA

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 15-10-2026 Heard Mr. Y.S Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K Das, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State.

2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Md. Iftikar Saikia, praying for grant of bail in connection with Paltanbazar P.S. Case No.245/2026 under Sections Page No.# 2/2 140(2)/3(5) of the BNS Act.

3. The gist of the allegation is that an FIR dated 09.09.2026 was kidnapping of the informant's younger brother. The earlier bail petition was rejected on 22.09.2026. As reflected in the previous order, the victim was recovered.

4. Case Diary was called for but it is submitted by Mr. K.K. Das, learned Addl. P.P that in the meantime, upon completion of the investigation, the Charge-sheet has been submitted.

5. In view of the completion of the investigation, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner, at this stage.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner namely Md. Iftikar Saikia, is hereby allowed to go on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that: (i) the petitioner shall co-operate with the trial, if one commences. (ii) the petitioner shall not commit any offense, nor threaten, harm, harass, tamper or hamper the informant side in any manner.

(iii) He shall not try to influence witnesses. Violation of any of the bail conditions shall entail cancellation of the bail.

9. In view of the above, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead