Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./3150/2026 of ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 October 2026
2026:GAU-AS:15774
GAHC010218962026 2026:GAU-AS:15774 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3150/2026 ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE S/O LATE KAMAL UDDIN R/O VILL RAKHYASINI GAROPARA PART I P S AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010218962026
2026:GAU-AS:15774
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./3150/2026
ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE
S/O LATE KAMAL UDDIN R/O VILL RAKHYASINI GAROPARA PART I P S
AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A RAHMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
ORDER
Date : 15-10-2026
1. Heard Mr. A. Rahman, the learned counsel appearing for the accused- applicant. Also heard Ms. A. Begum, the learned Addl. P.P, Assam appearing for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicant, namely Abu Bakkar Siddique in connection with Goalpara P.S. Case No.180/2026 registered under Sections
Page 1 of 2
Page No.# 2/2 318(4)/319(2)/61(2)/336(3)/304(2) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The allegation as levelled in the FIR is that the accused-applicant, who is a CSP holder and running a small business, induced various persons including the complainants to deliver their mobile SIM cards as well as various other documents including photographs on the pretext of opening bank accounts for providing flood- disaster relief from Azmal Foundation. However, it was found that the accused- applicant by using the SIM cards and personal details of the informants opened several bank accounts, whereby certain cyber crimes have been committed by the accused-applicant along with others.
4. On the basis of the FIR, police registered Goalpara P.S. Case No.180/2026 under the aforementioned sections.
5. The case diary in the instant case has been received and the same is perused.
6. The learned Addl. P.P., opposes the prayer for bail of the accused-applicant.
7. Taking into account the entire facts of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the accused applicant at this stage.
8. Accordingly, the instant bail application is rejected at this stage. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…