Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/4634/2026 of ABDUL MOZID Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS on 14 October 2026

GAHC010176362026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4634/2026 ABDUL MOZID S/O LT. MOJIBAR ROHMAN, VILL. GOSSAIGAON P.O. DAKHIN BIJNI, P.S. MANIKPUR, DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN 783390 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5

GAHC010176362026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/4634/2026

ABDUL MOZID

S/O LT. MOJIBAR ROHMAN, VILL. GOSSAIGAON P.O. DAKHIN BIJNI, P.S.

MANIKPUR, DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN 783390

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE (SETTLEMENT) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER

BONGAIGAON

P.O. AND P.S. BONGAIGAON

DISTRICT BONGAIGAON ASSAM

PIN 783392

3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

BONGAIGAON ZILLA PARISHAD

BONGAIGAON

P.O. AND P.S. BONGAIGAON

DISTRICT BONGAIGAON ASSAM

PIN 783392

4:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

MANIKPUR BLOCK

P.O. AND P.S. MANIKPUR

DISTRICT BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 783392

5:THE REGISTRAR

ASSAM INFORMATION COMMISSION

GADAPANI PATH

JURIPAR

Page 1 of 2

PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37

6:THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

ASSAM

GADAPANI PATH JURIPAR

PANJABARI GUWAHATI-37 ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R S CHAUHAN, MS. D CHAUHAN

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, INFORMATION COMMISSION,SC, P AND

R.D.,SC, REVENUE

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

ORDER

Date : 15.10.2026 Heard Mr. R.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. J. Handique, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 1; Mr. P.K. Medhi, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 2; and Mr. D. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Information Commission for the respondent nos. 5 &

6.

2. Mr. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Information Commission has submitted that the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 19[3] of the Right to Information [RTI] Act, 2005 was registered and numbered as Case no. 602698/[BNG]/1/2025. At the hearing of the appeal, the petitioner was absent without any intimation. The Information Commission after hearing the State Public Information Officer [SPIO] and considering his written statement, placed on record, had disposed of the appeal by an Order dated 11.02.2026 with a direction to the SPIO to give a formal reply to the petitioner with respect to the petitioner’s RTI application within one week of receipt of the Order dated 11.02.2026.

3. Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that as he has not been provided with such instructions, he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to assail the Order dated 11.02.2026, if so advised.

4. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for.

5. A copy of the Order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the Assam Information Commission in Case no. 602698/[BNG]/1/2025, placed by Mr. Deka is kept with the case record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead