Gauhati High Court
CRP(IO)/438/2025 of LONA DUTTA Vs NILMONI NANDI AND 8 ORS on 14 October 2026
GAHC010079492025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/438/2025 LONA DUTTA D/O- LATE ROTESWAR DEY W/O- AMOL DUTTA R/O- CHITTA RANJAN PALLY MEHERPUR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS NILMONI NANDI AND 8 ORS S/O- LATE NITAI NANDI
GAHC010079492025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : CRP(IO)/438/2025
LONA DUTTA
D/O- LATE ROTESWAR DEY
W/O- AMOL DUTTA
R/O- CHITTA RANJAN PALLY
MEHERPUR
DIST. CACHAR
ASSAM
VERSUS
NILMONI NANDI AND 8 ORS
S/O- LATE NITAI NANDI
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
2:GONESH NANDI
S/O- LATE NITAI NANDI
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
3:BASHUDEV NANDI
S/O- LATE NITAI NANDI
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
Page 1 of 3
4:KRISHNA NANDI
S/O- LATE NITAI NANDI
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
5:GOURANGA NANDI
S/O- LATE NITAI NANDI
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
6:CHITTA RANJAN DEY
S/O LATE MADHAV CHANDRA DEY
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
7:NIRANJAN DEY
S/O LATE MADHAV CHANDRA DEY
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
8:NIRMAL CHANDRA DEY
D/O LATE MADHAV CHANDRA DEY
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
9:LAKSHMI BALA DEY
D/O LATE MADHAV CHANDRA DEY
R/O- VILL.- KALINAGAR PART-III
P.O. KALINAGAR
DIST.- HAILAKANDI
ASSAM
PIN-788801.
------------
Advocate for : MS. R CHOUDHURY
Page 2 of 3
Advocate for : MR. D CHAKRABARTY (R-1 TO 5) appearing for NILMONI NANDI
AND 8 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
15.10.2026
1. Heard Mr. A. H. M. R. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also Mr. D. Chakraborty, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this CRP(I/O) has become infructuous and therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this CRP(I/O).
2. The prayer is not opposed to by the learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Hence, the same is allowed.
4. This CRP(I/O) is dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…