Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/1082/2026 of ARIFUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 October 2026

2026:GAU-AS:15784

GAHC010236242026 2026:GAU-AS:15784 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1082/2026 ARIFUL ISLAM SON OF MAINUL HOQUE , R/O HATIMURIA, WARD NO 04, MOIRABARI, MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE ,PP ASSAM

GAHC010236242026

2026:GAU-AS:15784

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1082/2026

ARIFUL ISLAM

SON OF MAINUL HOQUE , R/O HATIMURIA, WARD NO 04, MOIRABARI, MORIGAON, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE,PP ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : S K PODDAR, MS. R GHOSH

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./2790/2026

ARIFUL ISLAM

S/O MAINUL HOQUE

R/O VILL - HATIMURIA

WARD NO. 04

P.S.- MOIRABARI

DISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

Page 1 of 3

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ASSAM.

------------

Advocate for : S K PODDAR

Advocate for : PP

ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA

O R D E R

15.10.2026

Heard Mr. C. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. PP for the State.

2. This application has been preferred seeking correction in the order dated 12.10.2026 passed by this Court in Bail Application no. 2790/2026.

3. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner is Ariful Islam but it has been wrongly mentioned as Ajaharul Islam and Azaharul Islam at paragraph 2 of the said order.

4. Further, the name of the Police Station has been mentioned as Moibari instead of Moirabari.

5. Furthermore, two dates of arrest has been mentioned as 01.08.2026 and 24.08.2026 whereas there is only one date of arrest i.e. 24.08.2026.

6. Furthermore, at paragraph 4 and paragraph 7 of the said order, the words ‘petitioners’ has been used instead of ‘petitioner’.

Page 2 of 3

7. On perusal of the record, the aforesaid errors are corrected by directing that the name of the petitioner in paragraph 2 of the said order be read as ‘Ariful Islam’ instead of Ajaharul Islam and Azaharul Islam.

8. The name of Police Station shall be read as Moirabari instead of Moibari in paragraph 2.

9. Furthermore, the words ‘petitioners’ appearing in paragraph 4 and 7 shall be read in the singular as ‘petitioner’.

10. The aforesaid order stands corrected accordingly and the present petitioner shall be read alongwith the order dated 12.10.2026 in Bail Appln. 2790/2026.

11. The IA stands disposed of.

12. Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead