Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./3234/2026 of MONIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 October 2026
2026:GAU-AS:15792
GAHC010226122026 2026:GAU-AS:15792 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3234/2026 MONIRUL ISLAM S/O- ABDUS SAMAD AHMED R/O- VILLAGE- KHALISABHITA MUSLIMPARA, P.S- LAKHIPUR, DIST.GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM
GAHC010226122026
2026:GAU-AS:15792
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./3234/2026
MONIRUL ISLAM
S/O- ABDUS SAMAD AHMED R/O- VILLAGE- KHALISABHITA
MUSLIMPARA, P.S- LAKHIPUR, DIST.GOALPARA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N J DAS, MS. B DEVI
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
15.10.2026
Heard Mr. N. J. Das, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Monirul Islam, praying for grant of bail in connection with Dudhnoi P.S. Case No.41/2026 under Sections 318(3)/318(4)/61(2)(a)/112/56 of BNS R/W Section
Page 1 of 3
66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of IT Act.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had been arrested on 21.09.2026 in connection with the aforesaid case with an allegation of transaction of fraudulent amount through the CSP owned by the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, on coming to know that the amount which had been transferred through his CSP was not in accordance with law, had informed the cyber crime helpline after which the account in which the money had been deposited was kept on hold.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to participate in the investigation process.
6. The learned Additional Public prosecutor has submitted that it is a matter of a cyber crime and fraud therefore, the prayer for bail of the petitioner need not be considered at this stage of the investigation. He has submitted that the case diary has been received.
7. I have gone through the contents of the case diary and also noticed that in the forwarding report the arresting authority had noted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the cyber crime helpline after which the fraudulent transaction had come to light.
8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances including the fact that the petitioner had initiated the complaint and also having regard to the length of detention of the petitioner and the progress of the investigation, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner can be granted the privilege of bail at this stage.
Page 2 of 3
9. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.10,000/- with two suitable sureties of like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Goalpara, Assam who shall be at liberty to impose such other conditions as he deems fit and proper.
10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of.
11. Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…