Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3234/2026 of MONIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 14 October 2026

2026:GAU-AS:15792

GAHC010226122026 2026:GAU-AS:15792 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3234/2026 MONIRUL ISLAM S/O- ABDUS SAMAD AHMED R/O- VILLAGE- KHALISABHITA MUSLIMPARA, P.S- LAKHIPUR, DIST.GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM

GAHC010226122026

2026:GAU-AS:15792

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3234/2026

MONIRUL ISLAM

S/O- ABDUS SAMAD AHMED R/O- VILLAGE- KHALISABHITA

MUSLIMPARA, P.S- LAKHIPUR, DIST.GOALPARA, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N J DAS, MS. B DEVI

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

ORDER

15.10.2026

Heard Mr. N. J. Das, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.

2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Monirul Islam, praying for grant of bail in connection with Dudhnoi P.S. Case No.41/2026 under Sections 318(3)/318(4)/61(2)(a)/112/56 of BNS R/W Section

Page 1 of 3

66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of IT Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had been arrested on 21.09.2026 in connection with the aforesaid case with an allegation of transaction of fraudulent amount through the CSP owned by the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, on coming to know that the amount which had been transferred through his CSP was not in accordance with law, had informed the cyber crime helpline after which the account in which the money had been deposited was kept on hold.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to participate in the investigation process.

6. The learned Additional Public prosecutor has submitted that it is a matter of a cyber crime and fraud therefore, the prayer for bail of the petitioner need not be considered at this stage of the investigation. He has submitted that the case diary has been received.

7. I have gone through the contents of the case diary and also noticed that in the forwarding report the arresting authority had noted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the cyber crime helpline after which the fraudulent transaction had come to light.

8. Having regard to the facts and circumstances including the fact that the petitioner had initiated the complaint and also having regard to the length of detention of the petitioner and the progress of the investigation, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner can be granted the privilege of bail at this stage.

Page 2 of 3

9. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.10,000/- with two suitable sureties of like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Goalpara, Assam who shall be at liberty to impose such other conditions as he deems fit and proper.

10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of.

11. Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead