Gauhati High Court
Bail Appln./3144/2026 of AMIR ALI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 October 2026
GAHC010219492026 2026:GAU-AS:15678 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3144/2026 AMIR ALI AND ANR S/O LATE KHANDAKAR MOTIHAR ALI, R/O VILL BALAIPATHAR, PS KALGACHIA, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781319 2: MOSIUR RAHMAN S/O LATE
GAHC010219492026
2026:GAU-AS:15678
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Bail Appln./3144/2026
AMIR ALI AND ANR
S/O LATE KHANDAKAR MOTIHAR ALI, R/O VILL BALAIPATHAR, PS
KALGACHIA, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781319
2: MOSIUR RAHMAN
S/O LATE ABDUL GANI
R/O VILL BALAIPATHAR
PS KALGACHIA
DIST BARPETA
ASSAM
PIN 78131
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : R AMIN, MR. M HAQUE,S K RAHMATULLAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14-10-2026
1. Heard Mr. R. Amin, the learned counsel appearing for the accused- applicants. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. P.P. for the State.
2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicants, namely 1) Amir Ali and 2) Mosiur Rahman in connection with Kalgachia PS Case No.103/2026, registered under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985.
3. An FIR was lodged on 23.09.2026 before the O/C, Kalgachia P.S. by SI(P) Samar Barman to the effect that upon receipt of information, the police apprehended 2 persons, namely Amir Ali and Mosiur Rahman and from their possession 2.019 kg of ganja has been recovered.
4. On receipt of the FIR, the police registered Kalgachia PS Case No.103/2026 under the aforementioned sections.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicants submits that since the quantity of ganja recovered is an intermediate quantity and the accused applicants have already spent 22 days behind bars, the accused- applicants should be granted bail.
6. The learned Addl. P.P, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail of the accused-applicants.
7. The case diary in the instant case is received and the same has been perused.
8. Taking into account the facts in it’s entirety, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the accused-applicants at this stage.
9. Accordingly, the instant bail application is rejected. JUDGE Comparing Assistant