Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3071/2026 of ZIARUL HOQUE Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010218692026 2026:GAU-AS:15658 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3071/2026 ZIARUL HOQUE S/O- IMAN ALI, VILL.- BHALUKI SALMARA, P.O.-BALABHITHA, P.S.- BARPETA ROAD,D IST.-BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781313 VERSUS THE STATE OF

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010218692026

2026:GAU-AS:15658

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3071/2026

ZIARUL HOQUE

S/O- IMAN ALI, VILL.- BHALUKI SALMARA, P.O.-BALABHITHA, P.S.- BARPETA ROAD,D IST.-BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781313

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, MR M RAHMAN,MR. A S AHMED,T UDDIN

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 14.10. 2026

Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

2. The present petition is filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of Page No.# 2/2 regular bail to the petitioner, namely, Ziarul Hoque, in connection with Jagiroad P.S. Case No. 163/2026 under Section 338/ 61 (2)/ 318 (4)/ 308 of BNS R/W 66 © of I.T. Act, 2000.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has completed 90 days in custody during the investigation period and the charge- sheet has not yet been submitted and, therefore, the petitioner would be entitled to default bail.

4. The learned Addl. P.P. has fairly admitted that he is under instructions that the charge-sheet has not been submitted. In view of the above, the petitioner would be entitled to default bail.

5. Accordingly, the learned CJM, Morigaon, shall release the petitioner on default bail on such terms and conditions as the learned CJM may deem fit and proper.

6. The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead