Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/2274/2026 of SRI CHANDI RAM NATH Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS on 13 October 2026
GAHC010288242025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2274/2026 SRI CHANDI RAM NATH SON OF SRI SANKESWAR NATH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UPENDRA NAGAR P.O.- PRATAKHATA DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM PIN NO.- 783337 VERSUS THE
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010288242025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/2274/2026
SRI CHANDI RAM NATH
SON OF SRI SANKESWAR NATH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UPENDRA NAGAR
P.O.- PRATAKHATA DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM PIN NO.- 783337
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
OF ASSAM ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT DISPUR
GUWAHATI PIN 781006
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN
781006
3:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL
COUNCIL
KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370
4:THE CONSERVATOR OF FOREST CUM CHD
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370
5:THE ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST CUM
CHD
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370
6:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
SOCIAL FORESTRY DIVISION KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 783370
Page 1 of 2
Page No.# 2/2
7:THE RANGE OFFICER
SOCIAL FORESTRY RANGE FAKIRAGRAM KOKRAJHAR
PIN- 78334
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G BAISHYA, MD. A HASSAN,MR. D RABHA
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC, SC, FOREST,SC, FINANCE DEPTT.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 14-10-2026 Heard Mr. A. Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that the petitioner had taken adjournment, on the last date of listing, to amend the present writ petition. However, he submits that he is under instruction to withdraw the present writ petition and file afresh incorporating all the requisite particulars. Accordingly, he prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file the same. The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…