Gauhati High Court

Bail Appln./3162/2026 of AMINUR ISLAM ALIAS BABLU Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM on 13 October 2026

2026:GAU-AS:15679

GAHC010222992026 2026:GAU-AS:15679 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3162/2026 AMINUR ISLAM ALIAS BABLU S/O-MD. KASEM ALI. VILL.- KALPANI, CHANDAMARI P.S.- AGIA DIST.- GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED

GAHC010222992026

2026:GAU-AS:15679

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : Bail Appln./3162/2026

AMINUR ISLAM ALIAS BABLU

S/O-MD. KASEM ALI. VILL.- KALPANI, CHANDAMARI P.S.- AGIA DIST.- GOALPARA, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM.

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J AHMED, MS J YESMIN,MR Z RAHMAN

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA

ORDER

Date : 14-10-2026

1. Heard Mr. J. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the accused- applicant. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicant, namely Aminur Islam @

Page 1 of 2

Bablu in connection with Sessions Case No.162/2023 (G.R. Case No.2909/2015) arising out of Krishnai P.S. Case No.332/2015, registered under Sections 364(A)/325/ 307/34 of the IPC pending in the Court of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Goalpara.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been participating in the trial which is pending before the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Goalpara regularly and sometimes he was absent with steps. He submits that on the particular day, i.e., on 02.07.2026, the accused-applicant could not be present before the Court due to certain personal reasons and because of that NBWA was issued against him and subsequently, he was arrested on 18.09.2026 and since then he is behind bars. He submits that the accused-applicant has been appearing before the learned Trial Court and will appear before the learned Trial Court as and when required and therefore, he should be granted bail.

4. The TCR in the instant case has been received and the same is perused.

5. On perusal of the TCR and on consideration of the submissions made by the counsel appearing for the accused-applicant, this Court is of the considered view that the accused-applicant should be granted bail.

6. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused-applicant, named above, shall be released forthwith from jail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with one surety of like nature to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Goalpara, subject to the following condition:-

i) That the accused-applicant shall regularly appear before the learned Trial Court as and when required.

7. In terms of the aforesaid directions, the instant bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead