Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/890/2026 of ROHIT BORO Vs STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 13 October 2026
2026:GAU-AS:15665
GAHC010183692026 2026:GAU-AS:15665 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/890/2026 ROHIT BORO S/O RAJEN BORO RESIDENT OF DHULABARI SARANPARA P.O PS TAMALPUR, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010183692026
2026:GAU-AS:15665
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/890/2026
ROHIT BORO
S/O RAJEN BORO RESIDENT OF DHULABARI SARANPARA P.O PS
TAMALPUR, DIST. BAKSA, ASSAM
VERSUS
STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY ITS LD. PP, ASSAM
2:SMT SUMA DEBNATH
WIFE OF SAJAL DEBNATH RESIDENT OF 03
DARAN DEKA PATH NEAR GAYAN SCHOOL
JYOTIKUCHI PS DISPUR
GUWAHATI EAST
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A BHATTACHARYA, MS. K MALAKAR,MS K
TALUKDAR,MR. A BHATTACHARJEE,S J BASAK,N MECH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page 1 of 2
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER
Date : 14.10. 2026 Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that inadvertently the informant in the connected FIR had not been impleaded as a party respondent in the connected bail petition. He has accordingly submitted that he may be allowed to file an amended cause title in the bail application, after allowing the impleadment of the opposite party No.2 herein as respondent No.2 in the bail petition. The prayer is considered and allowed.
3. The Opposite No.2 herein shall be impleaded as the respondent No.2 in the connected bail petition.
4. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…