Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/4079/2026 of APTAN ALI Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 6 ORS on 13 October 2026
2026:GAU-AS:15698
GAHC010156712026 2026:GAU-AS:15698 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4079/2026 APTAN ALI C/O JAMAT ALI, R/O KRISHANAI GURIA PT- 1, GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783126 VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMEN,
GAHC010156712026
2026:GAU-AS:15698
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/4079/2026
APTAN ALI
C/O JAMAT ALI, R/O KRISHANAI GURIA PT- 1, GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN- 783126
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMEN, HAVING ITS CORPORATE CENTRE AT
STATE BANK BHAVAN, MADAME CAMA ROAD, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021
2:STATE BANK OF INDIA
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER
NORTH EASTERN CIRCLE
G.S. ROAD
DISPUR
GUWAHATI
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM -781006
3:THE BRANCH MANAGER
SBI KRISHNAI BRANCH
GOALPARA
KRISHNAI 783126
4:THE BRANCH MANAGER
STATE BANK OF INDIA
CENTRALISED CYBER CELL
(PATNA)
LOCAL HEAD OFFICE
4TH FLOOR
Page 1 of 2
JUDGES COURT RD
WEST GANDHI MAIDAN
PATNA
BIHAR 800001
5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE/STATION HOUSE OFFICER
KOTWALI POLICE STATION
JHANSI
UTTAR PRADESH- 284002
6:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CRIME)
GHY
KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM 781001
7:THE INDIAN CYBER CRIME COORDINATION CENTRE (I4C)
5TH FLOOR
NDCC II BUILDING
JAI SINGH ROAD
NEW DELHI
PIN 11000
Advocate for the Petitioner : R AMIN, S K RAHMATULLAH
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, B SAHA(R1TO4),MR. J BARUAH(R1TO4),DY.S.G.I.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
14.10.2026
Mr. S.A. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. Amin, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the debit-freeze instruction placed in Savings Bank Account no. 43792231390 of the petitioner maintained at Krishnai Branch of SBI has been lifted and the petitioner is operating the said Savings Bank Account. Ms. B. Saha, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 has also submitted that as per instructions received by her, the debit-freeze instruction placed earlier in the Savings Bank Account of the petitioner has already been lifted.
The learned counsel for the parties have conjointly submitted that there is no surviving cause of action, at present, to proceed further with the present writ petition for adjudication and the writ petition is to be closed. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is accordingly closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…