Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/5479/2026 of DR JAHIRUL ISLAM Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS on 13 October 2026

GAHC010220062026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5479/2026 DR JAHIRUL ISLAM SON OF MD. HAJARAT ALI, A PERMANENT RESIDENT OF ROWMARI GAON, P.O.- ROWMARI BILL, P.S. DHING, IN THE DISTRICT OF NAGAON, ASSAM-782123, AND

GAHC010220062026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/5479/2026

DR JAHIRUL ISLAM

SON OF MD. HAJARAT ALI, A PERMANENT RESIDENT OF ROWMARI

GAON, P.O.- ROWMARI BILL, P.S. DHING, IN THE DISTRICT OF NAGAON, ASSAM-782123, AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT H/O- SHIBBIR AHMED

CHOWDHURY, PHE ROAD, MADHURBOND PART 10, NEAR MAKTAB

SCHOOL LANE, SILCHAR, CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM, INDIA.

2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM

EDUCATION (HIGHER) DEPARTMENT

DISPUR

GUWAHATI-06

ASSAM

INDIA.

3:THE DIRECTOR OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION

KAHILIPARA

GUWAHATI-19

ASSAM

INDIA.

4:THE CACHAR COLLEGE

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL

TRUNK ROAD

Page 1 of 3

SILCHAR 788001

ASSAM.

5:THE GOVERNING BODY

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF THE CACHAR

COILEGE

TRUNK ROAD

SILCHAR 788001

ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G G GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

ORDER

14.10. 2026

Heard Mr. G. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. R. Tahbildar, learned Standing Counsel for Higher Education. The petitioner before this Court has filed this writ petition, seeking a direction for setting aside the additional Show Cause Notice dated 18.09.2026 (Annexure-7 of the writ petition). The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a proceeding has already initiated against the writ petitioner by issuance of Show Cause Notice dated 21.08.2025, and the petitioner has already filed his written statement. However, it is submitted that during the pendency of the said proceeding the impugned show cause notice was issued.

Page 2 of 3

The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that a written statement has been filed against the additional Show Cause Notice. Under such circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner does not wish to proceed any further in the writ petition. However, it is submitted that liberty be granted to the petitioner to redress the grievances, if the grievances are not redressed by the authorities. Considering the submission made this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed, with liberty. Interim order(s), if any, stands vacated. Pending I.A(s), if any, are also dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead