Gauhati High Court

WP(C)/2401/2026 of MIRA GOALA Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC010074842026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2401/2026 MIRA GOALA W/O LATE LATURAM GOALA, R/O PANDU TEMPLE GHAT, GUWAHATI- 12 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010074842026

undefined

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/2401/2026

MIRA GOALA

W/O LATE LATURAM GOALA, R/O PANDU TEMPLE GHAT, GUWAHATI- 12

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND

EMPLOYMENT, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG, NEW DELHI- 110001

2:THE GENERAL MANAGER

N.F. RAILWAY

MALIGAON

GUWAHATI- 11

3:THE GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION)

N.F. RAILWAY

MALIGAON

GUWAHATI-11

4:THE F.A AND C.A.O. (PENSION)

N.F. RAILWAY

MALIGAON

GUWAHATI- 1

Advocate for the Petitioner : MS D CHAUDHURY, MR A K PAUL

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S S ROY(C.G.C.)R-ALL

Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

14.10.2026 Heard Shri C. Paul, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Ms. D. Chaudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S. Barthakur, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri S. S. Roy, learned CGC. On the previous occasions, the issue had arisen regarding the jurisdiction of this Court to conduct this proceeding. Shri Paul, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum i.e. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The aforesaid submission is not opposed by Shri Barthakur, the learned counsel for the respondents. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead