Gauhati High Court
Crl.Pet./1282/2026 of RINKU JAISHI AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR on 12 October 2026
GAHC010197222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1282/2026 RINKU JAISHI AND ANR WIFE OF HASANUZZAMAN KHANDAKAR, RESIDENT OF VILL- KURSHAKATI, PO- MOLANDUBI, PS- KAZIGAON, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM-783334 2:
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010197222026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./1282/2026
RINKU JAISHI AND ANR
WIFE OF HASANUZZAMAN KHANDAKAR, RESIDENT OF VILL- KURSHAKATI, PO- MOLANDUBI, PS- KAZIGAON, DIST- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM-783334
2: HASANUZZAMAN KHANDAKAR
SON OF ABDUL MOZID MIAH
RESIDENT OF VILL- KURSHAKATI
PO- MOLANDUBI
PS- KAZIGAON
DIST- KOKRAJHAR
ASSAM-78333
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-01
2:SMTI KAMLA JAISHI
WIFE OF CHABILAL JAISHI
RESIDENT OF KHANGARGAON
PS- LUMDING
DIST- HO JAI
ASSAM-78244
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R BHUYAN, MR S ABDULLAH
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 13.10.2026
Heard Mr. S. Abdullah, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No. 1. Mr. Abdullah, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this matter becomes infructuous in view of the order dated 03.09.2026, passed by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court, in WP(C) No. 4678/2026, whereby the FIR impugned in the present petition, has been quashed. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of Mr. Abdullah, learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition stands closed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant